Skip to content
IGCSE·Tuition
Economics · Lesson

Identify structural features from supplied evidence

A case gives you a few sentences about a business, and the hard part is deciding which facts actually matter.

On this page
  1. What are the four features, and what evidence points to each?
  2. How do you turn evidence into a statement?
  3. Worked example
  4. The mistake to watch for
  5. Check yourself
  6. Where this leads next

To identify structural features, read the evidence for four things. These are how many sellers there are and how similar their products are. The others are how easy it is to enter the market and how much control sellers have over price.

This appears at the start of most market structure questions. Every later answer depends on it.

It builds on firms, costs and scale and leads into the study route for market structures.

What are the four features, and what evidence points to each?

Number of sellers. Look for counts or phrases such as “dozens of stalls” or “the only operator”.

Product similarity. Words such as “identical”, “interchangeable” or “each brand has its own recipe” matter here.

Ease of entry. Look for licences, large start-up cost, a long-term contract or a patent, which make entry harder. “Anyone can start” points the other way.

Control over price. Look at what happens when a seller changes price. If buyers walk away easily, control is limited.

A fifth clue is information: whether buyers can compare prices easily. Use it when the case mentions it.

How do you turn evidence into a statement?

Use a three-part sentence: evidence, feature, meaning. For example: “The case says there are 40 stalls selling almost identical corn (evidence), so there are many sellers of a very similar product (feature). One stall therefore has little control over price (meaning).”

Worked example

Read this fictional case.

Kelapa Ria is a coconut water seller in the town of Tanjung Sari. Eleven other stalls sell coconut water within the same street, all at about RM3.50 a cup. Customers rarely mind which stall they use. A stall needs a street permit costing RM60 a year. Last month Kelapa Ria raised its price to RM4.00 and sold 70 cups a day instead of 120.

Step 1, sellers: twelve in total (Kelapa Ria and eleven others).

Step 2, product: customers “rarely mind which stall”, so products are very similar.

Step 3, entry: a permit of RM60 a year is a small cost, so entry is easy.

Step 4, price control: a rise from RM3.50 to RM4.00 is about 14%, and daily sales fell from 120 to 70, a drop of about 42%. Sales fell by far more than price rose, so control over price is very limited.

Statement: The evidence suggests many sellers of a near-identical product, easy entry and very little control over price.

The mistake to watch for

A common slip is to use the single largest number as the whole story.

Mistaken answer: “Kelapa Ria sold 120 cups a day, so it is the dominant seller and has market power.”

The student read the sales figure and ignored that eleven rivals sell the same product at the same price.

The correction is to check all four features before you decide. One number rarely settles a structure.

Check yourself

1. A case says: “Rimba Telecom is the only firm licensed to run the island’s phone network. Building a rival network would cost RM900 million.” Name two features and the evidence for each.

Show answer

Number of sellers: only one licensed firm. Entry: a rival network would cost RM900 million and needs a licence, so entry is very difficult. Both suggest a sole seller with strong protection from newcomers.

2. A case says: “Seven bakeries sell loaves of similar size and quality. Bakery Kasih raised its price by RM0.20 and lost a third of its customers.” What does the evidence suggest about price control?

Show answer

Control is limited. A small rise in price caused a large loss of customers, which suggests buyers can switch easily to similar loaves from other bakeries.

3. True or false: “A firm with 60% of the sales in a market must be a monopoly.” Explain briefly.

Show answer

False as a general rule. A 60% share is large, but other sellers hold the other 40%. You would need evidence about close substitutes, entry and price control before using the word monopoly.

Where this leads next

Once you can pick the right evidence, move to explaining a competitive pressure on a fictional firm. Then test yourself with the market structures practice set.

Many students know the four features but lose marks by not quoting the case. In online one-to-one Economics tuition, a teacher can mark your answers and train you to quote the evidence every time.

Questions people ask

Which features should I look for first?

Start with the number of sellers, how alike the products are, how easy it is for a new firm to enter, and how much control a seller has over price. Most cases give clues for these four. Quote the clue, then say what it suggests about the market.

What if the case does not give enough evidence?

Say so. You can write that the evidence suggests a feature, and name what extra fact would confirm it, such as how many rivals sell the same item. Careful wording earns more credit than a confident label with nothing behind it.

Is a large firm always a monopoly?

No. Size and market position are different ideas. A firm can be large and still face many close rivals. Look at how many sellers offer a similar product and whether buyers can switch easily before you use the word monopoly.

Updated:

Your next step

If you can list features in a table but still hesitate when a case mixes useful and irrelevant facts, a one-to-one teacher can mark up your reading of the evidence with you and sharpen what you pick.

Paid one-hour trial at your assigned teacher’s confirmed rate, starting from RM80.

Tuition is arranged with a parent or guardian. Send them this page on WhatsApp and they can enquire for you.

Parents: enquire here

  • 9,000+ students helped through our service
  • 9+ years helping IGCSE students