Skip to content
IGCSE·Tuition
Co-ordinated Sciences · Study help

I cannot compare evidence across two sciences

The question gives you two sets of results from two sciences, and you are not sure how to line them up.

On this page
  1. What is actually going wrong?
  2. A four-step comparison method
  3. Worked example
  4. The mistake to watch for
  5. Check yourself
  6. What can you do next?

To compare evidence across a mixed task, state the pattern in each dataset with numbers, say where they agree and differ, then say what the data cannot show. The skill is a short, structured paragraph, not a long one.

This page supports the investigation evaluation module and sits inside the Co-ordinated Sciences learning guide.

What is actually going wrong?

Mixed tasks often hand you two tables from two contexts, for example a living system and a chemical reaction. Three habits cause lost marks:

  1. Two separate summaries. The answer describes table A, then table B, and never links them.
  2. Words without numbers. “It goes up” replaces “from 14 to 31”.
  3. A claim bigger than the data. Three readings become “always”.

A four-step comparison method

  1. Read each table once and write the pattern with two numbers from it.
  2. Line the patterns up. Is the direction the same? Is the size of change similar?
  3. Explain any difference using the science, only if the question asks why.
  4. State a limit. Name one thing the data cannot show and one reading that would help.

Worked example

A student investigates whether warming speeds things up. There are two sets of results, each from one run.

Set A, an enzyme (catalase) in liver, oxygen bubbles in one minute:

Temperature (°C)204060
Bubbles14312

Set B, magnesium ribbon in dilute acid, time until the ribbon disappears:

Temperature (°C)204060
Time (s)1205224

Step 1, patterns. In A, bubbles rise from 14 to 31 between 20 °C and 40 °C, then fall to 2 at 60 °C. In B, the time falls from 120 s to 52 s to 24 s, so the reaction gets faster each time.

Step 2, line up. Both sets speed up from 20 °C to 40 °C. In B, 120 ÷ 52 is about 2.3, so the reaction is about 2.3 times faster. In A, 31 ÷ 14 is about 2.2 times more bubbles. Between 40 °C and 60 °C the two sets split.

Step 3, explain. Particles move faster when warmer, so collisions are more frequent and more energetic, which fits B and the first half of A. An enzyme is a protein whose shape can be damaged by heat, which fits the collapse at 60 °C in A.

Step 4, limit. Each result is one run at three temperatures. We cannot say where A peaks, and the data does not show the exact temperature at which the enzyme is damaged.

Answer: “Warming speeds up both the enzyme and the magnesium reaction from 20 °C to 40 °C, by about 2.2 and 2.3 times. At 60 °C the magnesium reaction keeps speeding up, while the enzyme result falls to 2 bubbles, which is consistent with heat damaging the enzyme. Only three temperatures were used, so the peak for the enzyme is unknown.”

The mistake to watch for

Mistaken answer: “Both show that higher temperature means faster reactions, because in A the bubbles go up and in B the time goes down.”

The student ignored the 60 °C result in A, which contradicts the claim.

The correction is to read every point. A result that breaks the pattern is usually the point the question wants you to explain.

Check yourself

1. Table A shows 14 bubbles at 20 °C and 31 at 40 °C. Write the pattern with two numbers.

Show answer "Bubbles increased from 14 to 31 when the temperature rose from 20 °C to 40 °C."

2. A student says “the enzyme always works fastest at 40 °C”. What is wrong?

Show answer Only three temperatures were tested, so 40 °C gave the highest reading of those three, which does not show it is the peak overall. A reading at 30 °C or 50 °C might be higher.

3. Name one improvement that links to a real limitation in the example.

Show answer Test more temperatures between 20 °C and 60 °C and repeat each one. This addresses the limit that the peak is unknown and each result comes from a single run.

What can you do next?

Use the scientific investigation critic with your own description and data. Then read what a dataset can and cannot establish for the wording of a safe claim.

If the method is clear but your written comparisons still wander, a teacher in online one-to-one Co-ordinated Sciences tuition can work through your paragraphs with you, starting with a paid one-hour trial.

Questions people ask

What does it mean to compare evidence?

It means saying what each dataset shows, where the patterns agree, where they differ, and what neither can prove. A good comparison uses numbers from both tables. A list of facts about each one separately is only a description.

Do I need to know the exact cause of each pattern?

Explain the cause when the question asks for it, using the science in your 0654 syllabus. When it only asks for a comparison, describe the pattern with data first. Check the assessment details for your exam year on the Cambridge page.

How many readings are enough to be confident?

There is no fixed number. More readings and repeats make a pattern more reliable, and three points can only suggest a trend. Say what the data supports, and name what another reading would settle.

Can I use the investigation critic for this?

Yes. It prompts you to link each comment to control, sampling, uncertainty or improvement, using your own description and data. It does not write your answer for you, and it gives no instructions for hazardous experiments.

Sources

  1. Cambridge IGCSE Co-ordinated Sciences 0654 syllabus page

Updated:

Your next step

If comparing two datasets still turns into a list of facts, a paid one-hour trial lets a teacher watch how you build a claim and show you where the evidence stops.

Paid one-hour trial at your assigned teacher’s confirmed rate, starting from RM80.

Tuition is arranged with a parent or guardian. Send them this page on WhatsApp and they can enquire for you.

Parents: enquire here

  • 9,000+ students helped through our service
  • 9+ years helping IGCSE students